amanico[JLC Moderator]
344627
Thank you alot, Ztirual and Tony.
Nov 23, 2011,22:25 PM
So, there is no specific rule about Arrow hands and -1, -2, -3 and so on CK 2914?
That would explain why we saw both of this kind of hands.
Thank you so much, it will help me on my hunts.
To Ztirual: I completely agree with your criterias.
Best, my friends.
Nicolas
Comments:
view entire thread
Existential question on the Railmaster CK 2914.
By: amanico : November 23rd, 2011-02:44
Hello my friends, I am doing my homework on Railmaster CK 2914, but I see sme controversial informations on the hands. So you are my last resort... The question is: Do the hands on the CK 2914 have to be dauphine, or one of them has to be arrow? I saw a C...
Nicolas, it sounds like we are doing the same homework...
By: blomman Mr Blue : November 23rd, 2011-11:43
Maybe we should start a study group! Well, you know I am no vintage expert - but may I offer what I have seen so far..? These are the 2914-x that I have seen - not obvious been tampered with and with verified ref. Not that many but at least it gives a ind...
Both!
By: ztirual : November 23rd, 2011-16:54
I am no specialist, just an amateur but here is what I found out. There is published evidence of both broad arrow hour + dauphine minute hands AND dauphines for both in advertising during the first short period when the Railmaster was produced. My observa...
Agreed – both.
By: Tony C. : November 23rd, 2011-21:13
I have images of original adverts for both styles, so clearly they were both used. Cheers, Tony C.
Thank you alot, Ztirual and Tony.
By: amanico : November 23rd, 2011-22:25
So, there is no specific rule about Arrow hands and -1, -2, -3 and so on CK 2914? That would explain why we saw both of this kind of hands. Thank you so much, it will help me on my hunts. To Ztirual: I completely agree with your criterias. Best, my friend...